The story
Performance management, live at a Canadian municipality
County of Renfrew, Ontario's largest county by area with more than 900 employees, runs performance management live inside Workzoom. Goals and reviews sit on the same employee record as the recruiting, onboarding, time off and safety training modules the county deployed alongside it, replacing a stitched stack of paper forms and disconnected tools.
Running performance on the same platform as the rest of HR matters for public-sector employers specifically: a review referenced in a compensation request, a succession plan or a pay equity maintenance review is working from the same record rather than a reconciled export.
The story
Goal cascades, 360 reviews and continuous feedback
Workzoom lets an administrator define company goals and cascade them into department and individual objectives, so review cycles run against goals tracked through the year rather than reconstructed from memory. Six assessment types, including 360-degree reviews with peer feedback, self-evaluation and manager assessment, run from one template builder.
Disciplinary actions, ad hoc reviews and manager notes are logged the same way, so a year-end conversation is a summary of documented progress. The 9-Box and 12-Box talent grids plot performance against potential to give leadership a shared view of who is ready, who needs support and where the organization has gaps.
The story
Where performance connects to pay equity and compensation
Ontario's Pay Equity Act requires an established pay equity plan to be maintained on an ongoing basis, and an employer working toward pay equity is generally expected to direct at least 1 percent of the previous year's payroll toward adjustments each year until the gap closes. Because performance, compensation and pay history sit on the same employee record in Workzoom, the job and competency data behind a compensation decision is current rather than a separate spreadsheet reconciled once a year.
A performance review does not change pay on its own. Compensation requests are submitted and approved as a separate step, with the review available as documented context an administrator can reference, not a rating that triggers a raise automatically.